Thursday, May 28, 2009

The Knowledge Share Fair for Agricultural Development and Food Security: an unqualified success

The Knowledge Share Fair for Agricultural Development and Food Security: an unqualified success
20 – 22 January 2009, FAO Headquarters, Rome, Italy
www.sharefair.net
Background
From January 20 to 22, FAO was the stage for an innovative event called the Knowledge Share Fair for Agricultural Development and Food Security. This initiative was organized by FAO, in collaboration with Bioversity International, the CGIAR ICT-KM program, IFAD and WFP.

The goal of the Share Fair was to provide an interactive experience, allowing staff and the Rome-based constituents to:
  • share and learn from each others good practices;
  • experiment with tools and methodologies for knowledge sharing;
  • create linkages and networks for future collaboration between the organizations;
  • develop ideas to support and enhance knowledge sharing within and across our organizations.
The event was organized to showcase examples of good knowledge sharing practices in the field of agricultural development and food security. Specifically, it was structured to allow staff to learn from each other how knowledge sharing practices, methods and tools have enhanced their work and made their project(s) more successful and effective.

The Fair
During the Fair, 700 registered participants roamed the building, taking part in the numerous activities on offer. The participants came from organizing agencies, as well as from partner agencies such as Department for International Development (DFID), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), European Commission (EC), European Space Agency (ESA), Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR), Institute of Development Studies UK (IDS), Institute of Natural Fibres, International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists (IAALD), International Development Law Organization (IDLO), Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Technical Centre for Rural and Agricultural (CTA), World Bank and World Health Organization to name a few.

The 112 planned sessions around 8 themes, as well as the many spontaneous ones organized by the participants during the three days, covered various agricultural development and food security issues but focused on the knowledge sharing aspects of the initiatives. The sessions also used innovative and interactive means of presenting the projects, focusing on the experiences and lessons learned, as well as engaging other participants in discussions. Overwhelmingly, the sessions elicited a positive response from both presenters and participants.

The Share Fair also proposed a variety of trainings on tools for sharing knowledge, such as Blogs, Skype and Wikis. The trainings were completely booked even before the Fair started, so the organizers acted quickly to add extra sessions to fill the need. There is definitely scope for organizing more of this type of training, due to the incredible enthusiasm and curiosity expressed by participants. In all over 400 people participated in the 20 or so sessions and the results of the Share Fair survey clearly show a demand for more.

The Atrium turned into the nub of the Share Fair, the place to meet people. The Bar set up for the occasion greatly contributed to creating a convivial atmosphere, conducive to starting dialogues. In the 12 booths, Fair participants found all types of informative materials but also, and perhaps most importantly, they found people eager to talk about their project experiences. Over 50 people took the "90 second challenge", explaining the value-added of knowledge sharing in a short digital video, which are available on the Share Fair website. The Tree of Knowledge stood majestic in the Atrium, each leaf representing ideas and thoughts on knowledge sharing, handwritten by the participants themselves.

A team of social reporters documented the event in a variety of tools, such as the Share Fair Blog and Twitter. Through these means, thousands of people were following the Fair at a distance, in real time. Over 1000 photos were put on a photo sharing website called FlickR. The event was also cited in the media.

After Action Review
As a follow up to the fair, the Steering Committee conducted an After Action Review to evaluate the success and the lessons learned from the Fair. The key lessons learned, based on 200+ survey results as well as the experience of all the SC, were identified as:

  • Start early, at least a year in advance if you are organizing it for the first time.
  • Create a Steering Committee. Its process and work should be managed by a project manager and clear responsibilities need to be fulfilled by each member of the Committee.
  • Create a short and “to-the-point” submission form. Preferably, it should be online so that approved submissions can automatically become part of the agenda.
  • The KS Method that will be used for presentation should be discussed and selected based on the content of the submission.
  • Ensure there is a database, made available to all at least 3-4 weeks in advance, of all submissions. It should be organized by themes, sessions, days, and any other data breakdown which may be appropriate. The submissions should be evaluated instead of selecting all submissions with a focus on making each session as cross-organizational as possible.
  • There should be more interaction between the organizers and the participants prior to the Fair (which would need more resources) in order to establish a closer rapport. This would make clearer to everyone the intended substance and format of the Fair and its purpose.
  • As part of training in knowledge sharing methods and tools during any one of the Share Fair, there should be an introductory session on methods and tools, what these are, how they work, and what purposes they are suitable for.
  • Ensure appropriate language coverage.
  • There should be a better representation from decentralized offices (where appropriate) in terms of both cases being submitted and people attending. The Share Fair should be promoted in the decentralized offices and a budget for bringing people from the decentralized offices should be allocated during the budgeting process.
  • Promotion of the Share Fair, both one-way and more interactive two-way (interviews) should begin at least a month prior to the event.
  • Don’t organize video or poster session.
Emerging Needs from the Fair
Overall, the Share Fair garnered incredibly positive feedback. Participants felt they had a better understanding of knowledge sharing, concretely saw the benefits of interaction and dialogue, established new contacts and networked, shared experiences with others and learned a few new things, all the while having fun. The following needs emerged from the Fair:
  • Connecting/Networking is essential for ideas and innovation. There is a need for “informal” spaces to discuss and share knowledge.
  • Need for staff training in tools and methods for knowledge sharing.
  • Need to know who is doing what and where and create a skills and activity inventory.
  • Need for a greater degree of collaboration and working in partnership (to be more effective) between the departments, between headquarters and the decentralized offices, with external stakeholders and between staff.
  • Demonstrating how Knowledge Sharing makes work more effective and efficient.

Next steps
The Share Fair provided an alternative way of organizing an event which is in line with partner organization’s work on cultural change and that there is definitely scope for organizing more of this type of events in collaboration with other meetings. There was overwhelmingly positive response to the interactive methods used and spaces created for communication and discussion during the far. Each of the participating organizations have started to outline follow-up activities to the Share Fair.

The Share Fair may be over, but this is just the beginning of Knowledge Sharing and not the end!


Materials from Fair
• 90 Seconds Challenge: http://sharefair.blip.tv/
• All Tweets about Share Fair: http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23sharefair09
• Blog: http://sharefair2009.blogspot.com/
• Links: http://delicious.com/sharefair09/
• Photos: http://www.flickr.com/groups/sharefair09/
• Session reports: http://sharefair2009.blogspot.com/search/label/session%20report
• Share Fair Twitter: http://twitter.com/sharefair09/
• Slide Share: http://www.slideshare.net/sharefair09
• Web site: http://www.sharefair.net/

Sunday, February 22, 2009

A month later: Reflecting on the lessons and feedback from the Share Fair

Only a month ago, during the Knowledge Share Fair, the FAO building and atrium was buzzing with energy and had become a learning and meeting hub for members of management and colleagues from Bioversity, CGIAR ICT-KM programme, FAO, IFAD and WPF.


For three days it was a common sight to see the organizing committee's members of management running into each other, engaging in formal and causal conversations. For three days it was a common sight to see colleagues having an opportunity to engage in casual conversation with members of senior management.


Only a month ago, the knowledge tree in the atrium was experiencing a wonderful spring as participants added leaves carrying their ideas, experiences, words of wisdom and inspiration.

Only a month ago the various meeting rooms at FAO saw meetings held in a different and innovative way and witnessed enthusiastic participants rushing from one session to another.

Only a month ago the e-learning lab and facilitation room witnessing a wonderful buzz as participants were telling each other about the new knowledge sharing tools, methods and techniques they had just learnt.

A month down the road, all of us feel more enriched. We now have bigger networks, new friends and new peers. The Share Fair has managed to demystify KM for lots of people. As a result, the various organizations are embracing and embedding KM methods, tools and techniques in their core processes. There is more awareness about the power and potential of Web2.0 tools as KM enablers which has led to more willingness to use these tools. The Share Fair has also helped create new networks and partnership between and among organizations.

The results of survey launched during the Share Fair shows that 67.3% of the respondents considered the Share Fair as a breath of fresh air, while 55% thought it was innovative. 66.5% of respondents rated the sessions as interesting, 52.2% said that they learnt something new, and 31% considered the various sessions as creative.

The hands-on sessions were a smashing success, followed by the booths and the technical sessions. The poster and video sessions were far from being successful.

The feedback also indicated that there were far too many sessions and a suggestion was put forward to repeat sessions. Another useful feedback came from our non-anglophone colleagues pointing out that they could not fully benefit from the various sessions because of language barrier. All of these are priceless feedback and will help make the next edition better.

Only a month ago we lived the energizing buzz of Share Fair. Together we learnt that is possible to bring about change, convert the KM cynics to KM practitioners. Now the challenge is to keep up the momentum and as Anatole France once said: "Man is so made that he can only find relaxation from one kind of labor by taking up another." So when are we going to start working on the 2010 edition of Knowledge Share Fair?

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

A Tree at the Share Fair



The tree is an all-encompassing symbol of creation, knowledge, life, inter-connectedness, wisdom... and most assuredly, one of sharing across cultures. In Africa, in particular, stories are exchanged around a baobab tree, whose trunk is often remarkably reminiscent of human shapes, intertwined and suggesting communication from the roots lying under the soil and the branches above. The tree represents a transformation of what lies unseen and unformed in the dark into concrete outputs represented by its leaves and flowers – ultimately food (e.g. fruit), shelter (e.g. umbrage) and natural energy (e.g. timber). Its seeds are scattered by the wind.

And so the Fair had its tree... born from the hands of Nancy White. A
tree with bare branches in need of leaves... thoughts... inspiration. A tree in winter, which was able to make passers by stop, and fill it with leaves. A strange process was enacted: the more someone would clothe the tree, the more they would expose their own ideas, revealing their feelings and attitude towards sharing. Leaf after leaf.







During the three days of the Fair, everyone passing by the Tree would either stop to read what others had written or, wrote something on the spot, as inspired by the question appended to its foliage: What are your thoughts and ideas about knowledge sharing and the Fair?


Following the outline of the tree leaves, one could find that barriers no longer were there, as an entirely new geography had been designed. One where Asian wisdom (“Of all one’s riches, wisdom is the best gift” – in Hindi) lay close to European poetry (“Do you know the land, where lemon trees grow?”- in German). For sure, one would see that "knowledge is not power..... sharing is!" And so, let us cultivate ways to nurture this spirit of sharing. How? For instance, strengthening the contents of what we share (interview to Margaret Zito, FAO Library). Talking about what we can do (Patrizia Cocca, Global Environment Facility). Bringing back home new beginnings and projects, as arising form the contacts we’ve made at the Fair (Paul Quek, Bioversity International). Mindful that sharing challenges our beliefs, the silo we are confined in and the barriers we have grown fond of. Ultimately, sharing requires daring, for “only creative people can work for sharing” as Ryszard Kozlowski, Editor of the Journal of Natural Fibers, has stressed – in Polish and English.



The tree also benefited from the insights received from the Going Green Group based at FAO. Instead of keeping their initiatives and tips confined to their stall, members of GGG brought spring to the tree, adding a lot of thoughts on how to respect the environment – directly on the tree branches. Many thanks to GGG for sharing directly on the tree!




Further to all this, the tree did one other thing – silently, gently, the tree transformed the Atrium into a garden, into the garden of sharing. And what is a garden?

A garden is a room populated with trees and plants. For some, it is a room to be shared with friends or relatives, a room which can be visited and where time is spent. Many things occur in a garden - the changing of seasons, the aging of trees, the withering of leaves from green into yellow, the blossoming of buds on barren branches, shadow and light… anything happening resumes images from our life.

The experience of the garden is one of true sharing among living beings, between nature and man. So much so that zen practitioners can see gardens buzzing with activity and life even in barren surroundings. More correctly: as springing from barren rocks and sand. How can they do it? Is that why some are talking about the zen of knowledge sharing?

The tree is currently hosted in the FAO Library.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Presentations from the Opening and Closing Ceremonies

The presentations from opening and closing ceremony are available from SlideShare.



Monday, February 2, 2009

ShareFair….the 90 seconds challenge….

You can browse more videos on Share Fair from: http://sharefair.blip.tv

Here is an example!

Thursday, January 29, 2009

There is no "I" in "teamwork"!

As Roxy said in her post, Who made the Knowledge Share Fair possible?, "many colleagues, facilitators and volunteers worked hard and long hours to make the Share Fair a success." As the saying goes, there is no "I" in "teamwork"! Lots of people participated and helped us make this a successful event. We were all a great team and we would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone.

We will start with those who helped us with the logistics: from set up of the Atrium to the set up of the bar and from making all computers have internet to ensuring that each room had flip charts and projectors! A big thank you to all of you!

Aida Luberto (FAO), Alain Savary (FAO), Alessandro Pastori (FAO), Alexis Crespel (FAO), AnnaPaola DeSantis (FAO), Arslen Bounemra (FAO), Brigitte Bellemare (FAO), Carlo Crescitelli (FAO), Diane Calderbank (FAO), Dominique Burgeon (FAO), Elio Bargigli (FAO), Erwin Northoff (FAO), Fabio Lotti (FAO), FAO Staff Coop (FAO), Fernando Servan (FAO), Fiammetta Piperno (FAO), Fulvio Delli (FAO), GianFortunato Cangemi (FAO), Ingrid Alldritt (FAO), Johnny Hua (FAO), Leone Corazza (FAO), Livia Cellini (FAO), Luca Lodovichi (FAO), Luisa Guarneri (FAO), Marco Evangelistella (FAO), Marco House (FAO), Margaret Zito (FAO), Maria Barroso (FAO), MarieJose Piredda (FAO), Mario Alessandri (FAO), Massimiliano Bruzziches (FAO), Massimo Albanesi (FAO), Maurizio Cerrai (FAO), Mauro Caponetti (FAO), Michele Setaro (FAO), Ornella Loniti (FAO), Paul Anthem (FAO), Pauline Farrugia (FAO), Pierre Abramovici (FAO), Pierre Fournier (FAO), Piervito Muscaridola (FAO), Pietro Trecca (FAO), Rafael Rodriguez (FAO), Rebeca Andarias (FAO), Regina Gambino (FAO), Roberto Altomare (FAO), Roberto Bonafede (FAO), Scott Grove (FAO), Security Services (FAO), Sergio Ferraro (FAO), Sergio Perciballi (FAO), Sharon Lee Cowan (FAO), Silvana Leonardi (FAO), Simplice Ngathe (FAO), Stefano Scategni (FAO), Stephen Dembner (FAO), Stephen Dowd (FAO), Theresa Panuccio (FAO), Vincenzo Marciano (FAO)
Event such as this one needs support through out the days (and days leading up to it) to ensure that everything runs smoothly. At this point, the organizers can't be everywhere! We had great support from all the volunteers who took time out to help participants and ensure that everyone had a smooth sail! A big thanks to all of you!

Alberto Antonini (FAO), Alessandro Falasca (FAO), Angela Mancinelli (FAO), Angelica Abrina (FAO), Anna Maria Walter (FAO), Carole McCutcheon (FAO), Christiane Monsieur (FAO), Cinzia Noce (FAO), David Evans (FAO), David Lanzi (FAO), Domenica Baniak (FAO), Domenica Scola (FAO), Dyaa Ajkabache (FAO), Fabiola Franco (FAO), Francesca Launaro (FAO), Francisco del Pozo (FAO), Rosana Frattini (FAO), Gudrun Johannsen (FAO), Imma Subirats (FAO), Jane Russel (FAO), Jasmina Tisovic (FAO), Julia Matthews (FAO), Kirsten Geist (FAO), Kristin Kolshus (FAO), Laura Madrignani (FAO), Lisa Cespedes (FAO), Laura Rinnovati (FAO), Luciana Ianiri (FAO), Marco Danzi (FAO), Maria Folch (FAO), Marta Antonelli (FAO), Marta Iglesias (FAO), Mary Redahan (FAO), Massimiliano Fani (FAO), Massimiliano Martino (FAO), Monica Nutile (FAO), Montse Barba (FAO), Nicholas Waltham (FAO), Peter Bruggeling (FAO), Pilar Cabestany (FAO), Roberta Nettuno (FAO), Stefania Maurelli (FAO), Stefano Anibaldi (FAO), Stefano Pesci (FAO), Stefano Suozzo (FAO), Cristina Torquati (FAO), Tullia Baldassarri (FAO), Valentina Delle Fratte (FAO), Virginie Viollier (FAO), Vittoria Gliddon Ercolani (FAO)
Then there were the facilitators who made sure that the 112 sessions started in time, ended in time and of course during the session there was great discussion, sharing and learning! Thank you!
Andrea Pape-Christiansen (ICARDA), Anna Maria Walter (FAO), Anne Aubert (FAO), Antonella Pastore (CGIAR ICT-KM Program), Christiane Monsieur (FAO), Cristina Sette (ILAC), Eduardo Marinho (WFP), Françoise Trine (FAO), Geoff Parcell (Consultant), Gunila Olsson (IFAD), Günther Hemrich (FAO), Hugo Besemer (Consultant), Jean Balie (FAO), Johannes Keizer (FAO), John Preissing (FAO), Kristin Kolshus (FAO), Laura Madrignani (FAO), Luca Servo (FAO), Lucie Lamoureux (Consultant), Mami Wada (FAO), Manuel Flury (SDC), Marco Boscolo (FAO), Marco Piazza (FAO), Maria Grazia Bovo (FAO), Meenalosany Arivananthan (World Fish), Michael Riggs (FAO), Nadejda Loumbeva (FAO), Nadia Manning-Thomas (IWMI), Nancy White (Full Circle), Nick Waltham (FAO), Peter Ballantyne (IAALD), Peter Casier (WFP), Petr Kosina (CIMMYT), Pier Andrea Pirani (Euforic), Rasha Omar (IFAD), Riff Fullan (Helvetas), Romolo Tassone (FAO), Roxanna Samii (IFAD), Simone Staiger-Rivas (CIAT), Sophie Treinen (FAO), Stefka Kaloyanova (FAO), Stephen Katz (FAO), Stephen Rudgard (FAO), Valeria Pesce (GFAR), Yves Klompenhouwer (FAO)
Last but not least, the steering committee, who tried their very best in the last 10 months to ensure that the Fair would be a great learning and fun event! It was a pleasure working with all of you!
Andrew Nadeau (FAO), Ekram El-Huni (WFP), Elena Di Paola (FAO), Enrica Porcari (CGIAR), Gauri Salokhe (FAO), Jim Garber (FAO), Johannes Keizer (FAO), Nadejda Loumbeva (FAO), Patti Sands (Bioversity International), Ramin Rafirasme (WFP), Roxanna Samii (IFAD), Sophie Treinen (FAO), Stephen Rudgard (FAO), Stephen Katz (FAO), Willem Bettink (IFAD)
If we forgot anyone’s name, our apologies and a thank you!

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

What have the participants been telling us?

We have been receiving feedback from participants of the fair and here are just few snippets of what they have told us!

Congratulations to you and your whole team for a very well conducted Share Fair! I found it innovative in many aspects, and my colleagues who spent more time than me in the fair have given positive comments. -- Jan Heino, Assistant Director General, FAO Forestry Department
Great job. I really enjoyed what I could from the Fair. I felt the atrium was more alive than I have ever seen it before. -- Jim Hancock, FAO Technical Cooperation Department
The Share Fair was a unique opportunity for networking, connecting and learning between the three Rome-based agencies. The Atrium was an ideal place to do it and the organization and design of the space was excellent. I hope that the event encouraged organizers to repeat it every year. -- Judita Jankovic, Results-Based Management Analyst, WFP Performance and Accountability Management Division

I wish to extend my deepest gratitude and thanks to all of you for the highly commendable efforts you each displayed in the preparation for, and in the course of the Knowledge Share Fair, last week. The Fair has received very positive and favourable reviews from all sectors of the Organization, and I am sure that we are all very proud to have been associated with its success. -- Lorraine B. Williams, Assistant Director General, FAO Knowledge and Communication Department
As a facilitator I was really impressed by the energy in the sessions. It speaks well to the organizing group and the participants. In particular, I thought that the video sharing was effective. Each video one showed different perspectives - the need for water management policy and development, a women's entrepreneur training project, and a rural community development presentation. The participants had questions ranging from how to make the videos, to their purpose, and to their impact and use. It was an informative way to share! -- John Preissing, Senior Officer for Extension Systems, FAO Natural Resources Management and Environment Department

Congratulations! What an enriching experience & it brought much closer the UN agencies in Rome. We have gone from formal interactions among colleagues to collaborative & friendly communications & knowledge sharing. If it was up to me, I would have attended the 112 sessions! Thanks! -- Miriam Blanco,
Project Coordination and Communications Consultant, IFAD Finance & Administration Department